|
Post by account_disabled on Dec 3, 2023 1:58:44 GMT -6
Currently Dun Bradstreet in the amount of PLN At that time PUODO alleged that Bisnode as a data broker obtained personal data mainly of entrepreneurs running sole proprietorships from generally available public registers such as CEIDG The main accusation brought against the Company by the supervisory authority concerned the failure to fulfill information obligations towards persons whose data were obtained from public registers According to the information provided by PUODO the scale. Of non compliance with was quite large Phone Number List as it concerned nearly million records Now the circumstances of the entire case have been examined before the Supreme Administrative Court The main objection of PUODO regarding the administrative decision imposing a financial penalty was the failure to fulfill the information obligation provided for in Art GDPR At the same time the penalized company used Art section lit b GDPR which indicates that fulfillment of the information. Obligation is not required when providing such information turns out to be impossible or would require a disproportionate effort And this was the argument the Company used in its defense Bisnode pointed out that having only business addresses sending so many information clauses in the form of a registered letter would result in huge financial costs for the Company PUODO in turn pointed out that the regulations do not.
|
|