Post by muntahaislam222 on Feb 28, 2024 4:42:52 GMT -6
Taking advantage of the 404s that appear in Google Webmaster Tools in order to get links would not be the best title for this post, it would not even be a super sophisticated or extensive topic to write about. The fact is that I have found a case of a 404 in Google Webmaster Tools a few days ago and in this short post, I tell you my impressions. 404 errors in Google Webmaster Tools I was reviewing errors on the Madrid Geek Girls blog, putting some order and reviewing what I had indexed, sitemaps , and so on. When I get to the traceback errors, analyzing the 404 list, I find: 404 gwt errors The first I realize that there may be some internal link incorrectly placed or someone simply made a mistake linking. The ones that catch my attention are the following 2 errors. Is that a URL, Google? The details of the error tell us that it has reached that url and it gives 404 data error 404 Ok, let's see where it is linked from: linked from gwt All external links.
Links from Slideshare-type sites I'm going to one of the presentations to check the links they are sending us from there. The presentation link is correct, if we click on it we would arrive at .es" slideshare link As you can see, when I click on the link, the destination url is displayed in my browser, I have taken the screenshot so that it can be seen, without going into more depth. However, the url that Google Webmaster Tools tells us was another, specificallys.es/Occam." Reviewing the Europe Mobile Number List rest of the elements of the page and presentation, looking for that string: transcript slideshare In the transcript! There is all the content of the presentation translated into text, so to speak. Being mentioned above Avinash's blog, "Occam's Razor", has generated a url that Google tries to access and finds a 404. (Bonus: slideshare-seo-2/ ) What is the opportunity? If we had content that could be similar, we could redirect with 301 of the url that has been generated and that Google has followed.
Currently we do not have a single indexed content that expressly cites the word "Occam" occam contents Ehhh yes, we have 2 posts that name the blog contents occams razor If there is nothing, we either create it, or redirect to content that may be relevant, because content related to Avinash, we also have a few: avinash contents This would be a way to obtain a relevant link, with the simple analysis of Google Webmaster Tools errors, 301 redirection to the relevant content, or depending on the case, to the home page. 301 htaccess But what is the moral? This is confirmation of what some colleagues in the sector have been commenting for some time, about the revolution that the world of link building can become. It is a real case that demonstrates the existence and importance of mentions without links. If you want to read more about the topic, I am not going to ramble about co-occurrence, co-citation, and semantics, but in terms of applications of co-citation and link building, you can read these 2 articles that explain it better than.
Links from Slideshare-type sites I'm going to one of the presentations to check the links they are sending us from there. The presentation link is correct, if we click on it we would arrive at .es" slideshare link As you can see, when I click on the link, the destination url is displayed in my browser, I have taken the screenshot so that it can be seen, without going into more depth. However, the url that Google Webmaster Tools tells us was another, specificallys.es/Occam." Reviewing the Europe Mobile Number List rest of the elements of the page and presentation, looking for that string: transcript slideshare In the transcript! There is all the content of the presentation translated into text, so to speak. Being mentioned above Avinash's blog, "Occam's Razor", has generated a url that Google tries to access and finds a 404. (Bonus: slideshare-seo-2/ ) What is the opportunity? If we had content that could be similar, we could redirect with 301 of the url that has been generated and that Google has followed.
Currently we do not have a single indexed content that expressly cites the word "Occam" occam contents Ehhh yes, we have 2 posts that name the blog contents occams razor If there is nothing, we either create it, or redirect to content that may be relevant, because content related to Avinash, we also have a few: avinash contents This would be a way to obtain a relevant link, with the simple analysis of Google Webmaster Tools errors, 301 redirection to the relevant content, or depending on the case, to the home page. 301 htaccess But what is the moral? This is confirmation of what some colleagues in the sector have been commenting for some time, about the revolution that the world of link building can become. It is a real case that demonstrates the existence and importance of mentions without links. If you want to read more about the topic, I am not going to ramble about co-occurrence, co-citation, and semantics, but in terms of applications of co-citation and link building, you can read these 2 articles that explain it better than.